Respuesta :
Answer:
A. Corresponding angle theorem
Step-by-step explanation: I just took the test on edg
The missing reason of the proof is the corresponding angles theorem.
What is Corresponding Angles Theorem?
- This theorem states that, when the two parallel lines are intersected by the same transversal then the corresponding angles formed at the intersection of the two lines are congruent.
- When a line intersects two parallel lines then the angle formed at the same relative position at each intersections are known as corresponding angles to each other.
Given: a and b are parallel lines and c is the transversal.
Also, transversal c cuts two horizontal parallel lines a and b.
Now, four angles are formed due to intersection at line a, they are:
∠1, ∠2, ∠4 and ∠3. (As shown in the figure)
Similarly, four angles are formed at line b due to the intersection of c:
∠5, ∠6, ∠8 and ∠7. (As shown in the figure)
Now, we have to prove: ∠2 is supplementary to ∠8.
Here is the proof:
a || b and c is the transversal. (given)
From the figure we can see that ∠2 and ∠6 are corresponding angles, hence by corresponding angles theorem we can state that:
∠6 ≅ ∠2
Now, by using the definition of congruent, we can write:
m∠6 = m∠2
From the figure we can see that ∠6 and ∠8 are the linear pair of angles hence, ∠6 is supplementary to ∠8.
Now since we obtained that, ∠6 = ∠2, we can write:
∠2 is supplementary to ∠8.
Hence proved that, ∠2 is supplementary to ∠8.
Therefore, the missing reason of the statement ∠6 ≅ ∠2 is:
Corresponding Angles Theorem
Learn more about the Corresponding Angles Theorem on: https://brainly.com/question/12891423?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ2
