tmiles004
contestada

Imagine you are researching the effects of the Black Death in Europe. You have two sources available to you.

Source A: a student-produced website about the plague

Source B: a book written by a historian who is an expert on medieval Europe

Which source do you trust more? Why?

Respuesta :

A book written by a historian would be more trustworthy because it is researched and written by someone who is an expert. The student website might be accurate, but students sometimes make mistakes.
Tundexi

I prefer to use the book written by the historian because his work will be well detailed and unedited.

Today, we have access to histories from the past through works written by great historians. However, the written stories are edited to important event which people want to hear.

History works on a student-produced website also based on history written by historian and are susceptible to editing, lack of accuracy or mistakes

Works by a historian are most trusted because it well researched and written by an expert.

Therefore, in conclusion, i will prefer to access a book written by a historian while researching the effects of Black Death in Europe.

Learn more about this here

brainly.com/question/20353769

Otras preguntas