The accompanying specific gravity values describe various wood types used in construction. 0.32 0.35 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.41 0.41 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.44 0.45 0.46 0.46 0.47 0.48 0.48 0.49 0.53 0.54 0.54 0.55 0.58 0.61 0.66 0.66 0.67 0.68 0.76 Construct a stem-and-leaf display using repeated stems. (Enter numbers from smallest to largest separated by spaces. Enter NONE for stems with no values.) Stem

[tex]3\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3\\\\3 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 5,6,6,7,8\\\\4 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0,0,0,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,3,4\\\\4 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 5,6,6,7,8,8,8\\\\5 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1,4,4\\\\[/tex]

[tex]5 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 5,8\\\\6\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1\\\\6 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 6,6,7,8\\\\7 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ NONE\\\\7 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 6\\[/tex]

The stem & leaf show demonstrates that 0.55 for both the data is indeed a reasonable value.

The probable outlier is the data value 0.76.

The variability of the techniques is relatively large.

It show isn't symmetrical and seems to be optimistic.