Respuesta :
Answer:
If I had been a delegate at the constitutional convention I would have supported the New Jersey plan because the legislature would be unicameral and each state would have a single vote. While the Virginia Plan, states with a large population would have more representatives than smaller states. Large states supported this plan, while smaller states generally opposed it.
Explanation:
Amending or revising the constitution by a group of delegates is called a constitutional convention.
In the United States, it was contained in the year 1787 to create the constitution and to decide the governing rule for the country.
The New Jersey plan:
- The New Jersey plan was proposed by Paterson. This plan was based on a unicameral legislature.
- This proposal included an equal amount of votes from state and executive chosen by the national legislature.
- According to this policy, all the states will be represented fairly and will have the same controls.
The Virginia Plan:
- In the constitutional convention, the other plan Virginia Plan was proposed the Madison.
- This design divides the ruling body into the house of the council and the other as the house of representatives.
- This system supported the idea of two- branch system in the government.
- The states according to this proposal would be represented according to the wealth and the population rank.
Therefore, if I had been a member at the constitutional convention then I would have supported the New Jersey plan because of its one legislature policy.
While the disadvantage with the Virginia plan would be that the states with a bigger community would have larger representatives compared to the smaller states.
To learn more about the constitutional convention follow the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/8915678
