Question 1(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)

How did the Renaissance's emphasis on humanism help spark scientific thinking?

The humanist emphasis on mathematics led scientists to develop new technology and highly accurate measurement tools.
Increased confidence in human potential and individual worth encouraged ideas independent of traditional Church teachings.
Scientists now wanted to prove that Renaissance era religious beliefs were true.
Religion became unimportant to most people during the Renaissance.

Question 2(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)

How did the Renaissance contribute to the Scientific Revolution?

Renaissance thinkers encouraged individuals to question how things work, and scientists began to test these ideas with experiments during the Scientific Revolution.
Renaissance thinkers focused little on observation of the natural world, and the Scientific Revolution was an inevitable rebellion against this practice.
Because Renaissance scientists were largely unsuccessful, the Church was forced to fund a Scientific Revolution to improve quality of life.
Because Renaissance scientists used such accurate measurements in their experiments, later scientists could drastically improve the scientific process in other areas.
Question 3(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)

How did a shift in thinking about the natural world during the Renaissance contribute to the start of the Scientific Revolution?

Renaissance thinkers shifted from an emphasis on Latin to Greek.
Scientists shifted from thinking about the world to trying to understand how it functioned.
In the Middle Ages, scientists began to understand God as more of an observer.
Europeans shifted from thinking about how lands should be conquered to how they should be ordered.
Question 4(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)

What did Newton's book Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy argue about the role of mathematics in understanding the natural world?

Newton's book argued that mathematics and physical science were separate and could not explain each other.
Newton's book argued that gravity could not be explained by mathematics alone.
Newton's book made the bold argument that physical science required the use of faith to understand the natural world.
Newton's book argued that mathematical principles could be applied to our understanding of the natural world.
Question 5(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)

What contribution to modern science was made by Andreas Vesalius?

He created a vaccination that helped reduce the death rate across Europe in the 16th century.
He published On the Structure of the Human Body, which became the foundation of modern anatomy.
He is considered to be the founder of physiology, due to his extensive research on circulation.
He wrote public letters condemning the Church for its non-acceptance of early scientific thought.
Question 6(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)

How did Bacon's ideas on reasoning change the way scientific investigation was done?

Bacon's proposed use of inductive reasoning encouraged scientists to come to conclusions by way of data collection.
Bacon's theories on the elements of human reasoning led to advances in the realm of psychology.
Bacon's proposed use of deductive reasoning encouraged scientists to develop conclusions so as to direct data collection.
Bacon's rejection of analogical reasoning produced followers who would later develop the scientific method.
Question 7(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)

What did Kepler believe the relationship was between mathematics and the natural world?

He believed the natural world was created by God and that there was no relationship to mathematics.
He believed that any relationship between nature and mathematics was a coincidence.
He saw no value in studying the relationship between nature and mathematics.
He noticed that everything in the natural world had mathematical properties, and they could be used to study and measure everything.
Question 8(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)

Why did the Church seek to silence Galileo?

Galileo's observations changed the way we measure space and threatened Church territorial holdings.
Galileo's observations could prove Copernicus's theories about the order of the universe.
Galileo's observations threatened the control the Church had over moral authority.
Galileo's observations threatened the Church's role in proselytizing in the New World.
Question 9(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)

Francis Bacon created a new way of scientific thinking called inductive reasoning. How was this different from the deductive reasoning of earlier eras?

Scientists had to be inducted into a society in order to conduct experiments.
Scientists no longer had to prove their ideas.
Scientists now gathered information and facts before creating a theory.
Inductive reasoning was faster and easier than deductive reasoning.

During the Renaissance, Humanism replaced the strong religiosity of the European Middle Ages. Therefore, in many fields, like arts, politics, and science, the human intellect was boosted to explore and experiment with new ideas that were forbidden under the traditional Church teachings.

2. A) Renaissance thinkers encouraged individuals to question how things work, and scientists began to test these ideas with experiments during the Scientific Revolution.

During the Renaissance, artists and technicians gave great importance to the observation of reality, study of nature, and experimentation. This new way of experiencing reality independent from the bonds of religion and moral sparked the Scientific Revolution. Thanks to this environment, scientists like Galileo, who used a telescope for the first time, Kepler, and Tycho Brahe, made observations of the heavenly bodies that changed completely the way we understood how the universe works.

3. B) Scientists shifted from thinking about the world to trying to understand how it functioned.

During the Middle Ages, natural philosophers accepted without any doubt the theories about how the world works proposed by Aristotle millennia ago. All these theories were based on mere speculation, but the new Renaissance spirit pushed scientists to test these theories and try to understand what they were observing. It was the birth of the scientific method.

4. D) Newton's book argued that mathematical principles could be applied to our understanding of the natural world.

In Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, Sir Isaac Newton argued that Mathematics is the language of nature and, therefore, every action in the natural reality could be understood through mathematical study.

5. B

He published On the Structure of the Human Body, which became the foundation of modern anatomy.

This book had a great impact on the study of human anatomy and Andreas Vesalius is considered one of the most important figures in medical research of all times due to this work.

6. A) Bacon's proposed use of inductive reasoning encouraged scientists to come to conclusions by way of data collection.

The British philosopher, Francis Bacon, is considered the father of empiricism. He made precise rules for the new experimental scientific method using inductive reasoning, which consisted of collecting individual data, look for patterns, and come to general conclusions or laws.

7. D) He noticed that everything in the natural world had mathematical properties, and they could be used to study and measure everything.

Johannes Kepler, who was a German mathematician, physicist, and astronomer, had a great influence from the Pythagorean school. According to this way of thought, everything could be reduced to numbers and arithmetical proportions and relations. Thus, Kepler restlessly looked for mathematical patterns in the order and motion of heavenly bodies.

8. B) Galileo's observations could prove Copernicus's theories about the order of the universe.

Galileo's observations through the telescope provided empirical proofs for the Copernicus' model, that stated that the Earth moves around the Sun, and not the other way around as the Church said. This was an affront to the authority of the Catholic Church, and for that reason, it wanted to silence Galileo.

9. C) Scientists now gathered information and facts before creating a theory.

Inductive reasoning consists of collecting particular data, look for the patterns that data shares, and come to general conclusions. For example, "John and Peter are men, John and Peter are mortal, therefore all men are mortal", the general conclusion here is "all men are mortal." Deductive reasoning is the opposite, it parts from general or universal law and then it is applied to particular cases. For example, the general law is "all men are mortal", since John and Peter are men, therefore, John and Peter are mortal.