Instructions for Question 2 1. Evaluate the following three arguments. 2. In your evaluation, state whether the argument is inductive or deductive, value or empirical, contains a fallacy or not (stipulate which fallacy if it contains one) and whether it is valid/invalid or sound/unsound or strong/weak. 3. Present your responses on how you have evaluated the three arguments in the form of a table. The table is provided below after the three arguments: Argument 2.1 It is not wrong to kill spiders (not A). But if spiders have eternal souls (B), then it is wrong to kill them (A). Thus, it is false that spiders have eternal souls (not B). Argument 2.2 The work of a garbage collector is of great importance (1). The pay is good and the hours are reasonable (2). So, your reluctance to take this job is beyond comprehension (3). Argument 2.3 All black people are African people (a), and all Zulu speaking people are black people (b). Hence, all Zulu speaking people are African people (c). Table in which to provide your answers is here below. But you can also draw your own table. Argument 2.1 Argument 2.2 Argument 2.3 Inductive or Deductive Value or empirical Fallacy? If 'Yes,' which? Valid / invalid or sound/ unsound [marks 1x12=12]
