Believing that intelligence is fixed from birth (i.e. the "nature" argument) can be a dangerous and self-defeating way to think, according to the author of the Counterpoint essay. Are there any similar problems in believing that a person's intelligence is shaped mainly by their environment? In an essay of 300 words or more, argue whether there are any dangers to attributing a person's intelligence mainly to socioeconomic factors. Cite and debate specific points made by both authors in your writing.